P. v. Parhar
A jury convicted defendant of car burglary and receiving stolen property. On appeal, defendant asserts the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions, the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the proper number of custody credits, and the court security fee must be stricken because it was based on a nonexistent statute. Court conclude the judgment and the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the proper statutory basis for the court security fee and the proper number of days of custody credit, respectively. Court also conclude that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions.
Comments on P. v. Parhar