legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ocegueda
Appellant appeals from the judgment entered following his plea of no contest to the charge of first degree murder (Pen. Code, 187 subd. (a)) and the allegation that a principal was armed with a firearm ( 12022, subd. (a)(1)). In accordance with appellants plea bargain, the trial court sentenced appellant to 26 years to life, consisting of 25 years to life for the murder and one year for the firearm enhancement. Court appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) Court note, however, that the abstract of judgment and the minute order of judgment contain clerical error. The abstract and minute order indicate that appellant received a one-year enhancement under section 12022.53, subdivision (d). As the reporters transcript states, the court imposed the one-year enhancement under section 12022, subdivision (a)(1). The appeal is dismissed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale