legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Sherri G.
The Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) filed a juvenile dependency petition on behalf of Michelle G. (age 13), Rebecca Z. (age 11), Victor Z. (age 10), Refugio L. (age 6), and Sherri G. (19 months). After a lengthy but unsuccessful reunification period, the juvenile court terminated reunification services and parental rights. Terri Z., the childrens mother (hereafter mother), and Anthony G., Sherris father (hereafter father), appeal the juvenile courts decisions. Mother and father argue that the juvenile court erred in denying their petitions under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and failing to apply the beneficial relationship under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A).
Court conclude that the juvenile court properly found that the children would not have benefited from continuing their relationship with their biological parents and that adoption was in the childrens best interests. Court affirm the courts findings and orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale