In re C.M
Desiree H. (mother) appeals from an order denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 for an order granting reunification services with A. H., born in 2006, and further reunification services with C. M., born in 2002. Mother contends it was an abuse of discretion to deny a hearing on the petition. As the petition failed to make a prima facie showing warranting a hearing, the dependency court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition without a hearing. Accordingly, Court affirm the order.
Comments on In re C.M