In re Brian H.
Appellant Darryl H. appeals from the orders made under Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300 and 361 finding dependency court jurisdiction over his son, Brian H., and removing Brian from Darryls custody. Darryl contends that no substantial evidence supported the dependency courts finding of jurisdiction under section 300, the court erred when it found by clear and convincing evidence that Brian faced a substantial risk of harm if he were not removed from Darryls custody, and the court abused its discretion by ignoring reasonable alternatives to removing Brian. Court disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re Brian H.