legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Lucien S.
Pablo S. (father) appeals from the judgments declaring his children, Lucien S., Etienne S., and Jolie S., dependents of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 and from the orders removing them from his custody. Father raises the following contentions: (1) the order granting rehearing was unauthorized and deprived him of due process; (2) permitting one witness to testify in chambers violated his right to confrontation; and (3) substantial evidence does not support the jurisdictional findings and dispositional orders.
Court hold that the grant of rehearing was authorized and did not deprive father of due process. Father forfeited the issue pertaining to receiving testimony in chambers by failing to object to the procedure. Substantial evidence supports the findings and orders. Accordingly, the judgments and orders are affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale