legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Miguel L.
Appellant Miguel L., a minor, appeals from an order of the juvenile court in which he was found to be a ward of the court as described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. He was charged with a violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1), assault with a deadly weapon, and section 594, subdivision (a), vandalism with over $400 in damage. At the adjudication hearing, the juvenile court found the allegations of the petition to be true.
Appellant was ordered into a Camp Community Placement Program for a period of six months. On appeal, appellant contends that the juvenile court misapplied the law concerning his self-defense claim, there was insufficient evidence to support the true finding of felony vandalism, the juvenile court failed to declare explicitly whether the vandalism offense was a felony or a misdemeanor, and a probation condition was unconstitutional. Court agree that there was insufficient evidence to support the vandalism offense as a felony and the probation condition was vague. In all other respects, Court find no grounds for reversal and affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale