legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Arrington
Shaun Arrington appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by jury of attempted carjacking (Pen. Code, 664/215, subd. (a)) with the finding that he had sustained a prior juvenile adjudication which was alleged within the meaning of the three strikes law ( 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)). He was sentenced to prison for five years, comprised of the two-year, six-month middle term for attempted carjacking doubled under the three strikes law.
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish that his prior juvenile adjudication constituted a violent or serious felony and therefore it did not qualify as a strike under the three strikes law.
Court conclude that the matter must be remanded for a determination of this issue by the trial court. Court otherwise affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale