legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hale
A jury convicted Defendant of unlawfully taking/driving a vehicle (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a)). In bifurcated proceedings, the jury found that Hale had a prior conviction for which he had served a prison term (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b)) and two strike priors. (Pen. Code, 667, subds. (c) & (e)(2)(A).) He was sentenced to prison for 25 years to life and appeals, claiming the trial court erroneously denied his motion for a mistrial or to strike the victims testimony, misinstructed the jury and failed to poll it. He also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and the true finding as to one of his strike priors and the prosecutor committed misconduct. Court reject all his contentions, save the one concerning the insufficiency of the evidence of the strike prior. Court agree with this latter contention, and, therefore, reverse the true finding and defendants sentence, remand the matter for retrial of the strike allegation, and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale