In re Omar E.
Mary E. appeals a judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, Omar E., and an order denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition, in which she requested that she be provided reunification services and that Omar be placed with her. She contends that the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying her petition because she established that there had been a significant change in circumstances, and that reunification was in Omar's best interests. Omar's father, Tomas M., joins in Mary's brief and argues that his and Mary's parental rights should be reinstated. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Omar E.