Attorney Recovery Systems v. Martin
Defendants appeal from a judgment in this action to set aside the transfer of residential property as violative of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). Following a court trial, the court found the Martins who purchased the property from the plaintiffs judgment debtor jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for damages in the amount of approximately $25,000.
In this pro se appeal, the Martins contend the evidence was insufficient to show they possessed actual, subjective knowledge of fraud by property transferees. Court find the evidence was sufficient on the dispositive fact of whether they gave a reasonably equivalent value for the property, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Attorney Recovery Systems v. Martin