P. v. Jesus
Defendant appeals from an order revoking probation and imposing sentence after a plea and a contested hearing. He contends: (1) The trial court abused its discretion and denied defendant due process by revoking his probation for failure to complete sex offender therapy. (2) The trial court abridged defendants constitutional due process rights by admitting a therapists hearsay statement to a probation officer about defendants progress in treatment. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Jesus