legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Crenshaw
A jury convicted Douglass L. Crenshaw of first degree murder committed during the commission of a robbery and burglary and by using a deadly weapon. The court sentenced him to prison for life without the possibility of parole. Crenshaw petitions for a writ of habeas corpus contending the sentencing court improperly imposed a parole revocation restitution fine under Penal Code section 1202.45[1]("In every case where a person is convicted of a crime and whose sentence includes a period of parole, the court shall at the time of imposing the restitution fine pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1202.4, assess an additional parole revocation restitution fine in the same amount . . . .").
The judgment is modified to strike the restitution fine under section 1202.45. The superior court is directed to prepare an amended abstract of judgment reflecting the modification and forward it to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale