In re Nathan G.
Oscar G. (father) appeals from the juvenile courts order terminating his parental rights and freeing his two year old son, Nathan G. (Nathan), for adoption pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] We appointed counsel to represent father in this appeal. After examination of the record, fathers attorney submitted a letter pursuant to In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, indicating an inability to find any arguable issues. On February 2, 2007, we advised father by letter that he had 30 days in which to submit any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. Father submitted a letter on March 6, 2007, in which he contends that he was not adequately represented by his attorney in the juvenile court proceedings.
After independently reviewing the record, we hold that father has failed to establish his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Court therefore affirm the juvenile courts order terminating his parental rights.
Comments on In re Nathan G.