Kerr v. Jeld-Wen
The trial court sustained respondent Jeld Wen, Inc.s (Jeld Wen) demurrer to appellant James Kerrs fraud cause of action without leave to amend. Later, it denied Kerrs motion for leave to amend his complaint. Kerr appeals from the subsequent judgment of dismissal, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion (1) by sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend and (2) by denying his motion to amend the complaint. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Kerr v. Jeld-Wen