P. v. Luna
Defendant Julio Luna pled no contest to being a felon in possession of ammunition and giving false identification to police officers after the court denied his suppression and Faretta motions. On appeal, defendant argues that the court improperly denied the suppression motion because the Sacramento police officers relied on information from anonymous informants that failed to establish a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. He also argues that he made two unequivocal Faretta motions, and as a result he was denied the right to represent himself.
Disagreeing on both issues, Court affirm the trial courts judgment.
Comments on P. v. Luna