Singh v. Bd. of Trustees of the Cal.StateUniversity
On the day set for trial, plaintiff Rahul Singh and defendant Board of Trustees of the California State University (University) entered into a written settlement agreement, and orally confirmed the agreement on the record before the court. A few days later, Singh sought to renegotiate the terms of the settlement agreement and, when University rejected his request, sought to vacate the settlement and reinstate his lawsuit. The court denied his motion, and granted University's cross motion to enforce the settlement agreement. Singh argues on appeal that because he was the victim of extrinsic fraud, the court abused its discretion by denying his motion to vacate the settlement agreement.
Comments on Singh v. Bd. of Trustees of the Cal.StateUniversity