P. v. Bazik
Defendant and appellant Valod Bazik appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of possession for sale of heroin and offering to sell heroin. He contends he was denied due process as a result of: (1) the denial of his Pitchess motion and (2) being sentenced to the upper term in violation of his right to a jury trial. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Bazik