legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. SHADDEN Part I
Owner consent defense to a charge of firing at an unoccupied vehicle requires the consent of all owners, so it was not error to convict defendant of firing at a vehicle co owned by himself and his wife where the wife did not consent. Imposition of upper term based on facts found by judge rather than jury did not violate federal constitutional right to jury trial where trial court exercised discretion to impose the upper term instead of a longer sentence that could have been imposed under the Three Strikes Law.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale