legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. THE BRODERICK BOYS Part II
Defendants were not required to admit gang membership in order to move to dissolve anti-gang injunction where plaintiff alleged that defendants were gang members and served them with the injunction. Injunction was void for lack of notice as to moving defendants where none of the moving defendants was personally served; plaintiff failed to show that the gang was an unincorporated association so that service on one member would bind the others; only member served was of unknown rank and disclaimed any intention of appearing in court; moving defendants asserted that they had no prior knowledge of proceedings and that they would have appeared if they had; and there was no showing that plaintiff could not have effectuated service in a manner more likely to give actual notice.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale