legal news


Register | Forgot Password

COUNTY OF AMADOR v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Part II
Agreement obligating city to vacate a portion of a city road to provide access to a proposed casino hotel, to remodel an existing fire station in order to serve the hotel property, and to construct connections to the casino's sewer and water systems and to increase their capacities to meet the needs of the casino development was a "project" within the meaning of CEQA. City's approval of agreement without performing an initial study to determine whether to prepare a negative declaration or an EIR violated CEQA; where agreement was, by its terms, contingent on comprehensive mitigation of negative impacts, severance of provisions violating CEQA, permitting enforcement of remainder of the agreement, would preclude fulfillment of agreement's central objectives and was correctly denied by the court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale