BRAVO v. THE SUPERIORCOURTOFLOS ANGELESCOUNTY
Petitioner challenges the trial courts striking of his peremptory challenge under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 on the grounds his complaint was related to a prior action before the same trial judge and therefore the challenge was untimely. We find the second action was not a continuation of the first action and therefore that Bravos challenge, filed two days after assignment of his case to the trial judge, was timely. Court grant the petition.
Comments on BRAVO v. THE SUPERIORCOURTOFLOS ANGELESCOUNTY