legal news


Register | Forgot Password

CASTILLO v. PACHECO
Cause of action against a person arising from an act of that person in furtherance of his or her right of free exercise of religion is not subject to special motion to strike under anti SLAPP statute, which does not import First Amendment protections wholesale but specifically defines "protected activity" as "conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest."

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale