legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Pauline H.
Appellant appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights to her daughter Pauline H. (born 2004) and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26.) She principally challenges the evidence supporting the juvenile courts finding that Pauline likely would be adopted and rejection of her evidence and argument that the case came with the exceptions to termination described by section 366.26, subdivisions (c)(1)(A) (no termination if termination would be detrimental to the child because the parents maintained regular visitation and the child could benefit from continuing the relationship), and (c)(1)(E) (no termination if there would be substantial interference with a sibling relationship). Court affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale