legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Browne
A jury convicted defendant of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a); count three) and possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, 11364; count five). It acquitted him of transporting methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11379, subd. (a); count one) and possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11377, subd. (a); count two). Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for three years on the condition, among others, that he serve 170 days of incarceration.
Defendant contends, and the People concede, the trial court erred reversibly by admitting evidence that he elected not to answer questions deputies directed at him during a traffic stop. For guidance on remand, Court consider defendants claims that prejudicial photographs and a codefendants statement were erroneously admitted in evidence; and that CALJIC No. 17.01, which was limited to the stolen property count, should have applied as well to the paraphernalia count.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale