legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Holltywood Commercial Realty v. Sands
Hollywood Commercial Realty, Inc. (Hollywood), as assignee of Ramsey Shilling Commercial Real Estate (R/S), brought this action for breach of contract against William Sands (Sands) after he allegedly failed to pay lease and sales commissions owed under the terms of the parties agreement. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for Hollywood, finding that Hollywoods claim for lease commissions was time-barred, but that Hollywoods claim for a sales commission was timely and due. As the prevailing party, Hollywood moved for attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1717; the trial court denied Hollywoods motion.
Both Hollywood and Sands have appealed. Sands contends that the judgment should be reversed because all of Hollywoods contract claims are time barred. Hollywood argues that the trial court erroneously denied its request for attorney fees. Court are not convinced by any of the arguments on appeal. Accordingly, Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale