Mitchell Brown Gen. Engineering v. Kraft
An individual and corporation appeal from an order granting a motion to add them as judgment debtors. The judgment creditor claimed the individual and corporation were the alter egos of the original judgment debtor. The superior court agreed. On appeal, the individual and corporation contend (1) the superior court lacked jurisdiction because of improper service, (2) the superior court applied an incorrect standard of law, (3) the superior court improperly took judicial notice of certain materials, and (4) the evidence submitted was insufficient to support the superior courts findings under the alter ego doctrine.
Court make the following conclusions of law. First, the superior court had jurisdiction of the person over the individual and corporation as a result of their general appearance. Second, the superior court did not commit error by applying the wrong legal standards to the disputed matters. Third, the findings of fact (both express and implied) were supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Mitchell Brown Gen. Engineering v. Kraft