legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Michael O. v. Sup. Ct.
Parents of dependent child Rachel O. and her siblings Jeremy and Kaitlyn, petition for extraordinary writ review of orders granting Rachels petition alleging changed circumstances pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 and setting a second permanency planning hearing pursuant to section 366.26. ( 366.22, 366.26; California Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) These recent orders issued after we earlier reversed the juvenile courts denial of Frances section 388 petition and termination of her parental rights and ordered the juvenile court to return Rachel to her parents. (In re Rachel O. (Feb 8, 2006, B183736) [nonpub. opn.] (Rachel II).) Court grant the petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale