legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Reynaldo M.
The minor, Reynaldo M., appeals from the June 2, 2006 order declaring him a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) and placing him in a short-term camp community placement program. The juvenile court sustained the allegations of delinquency petitions filed March 16 and April 5, 2006, charging the minor with: possession of tools to commit vandalism or graffiti (Pen. Code, 594.2, subd. (a)); stun gun possession (Pen. Code 12651, subd. (d)); second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211); and carrying a switchblade knife. (Pen. Code, 653k.) The juvenile court declared the robbery a felony and the remaining three counts misdemeanors. The clerks minutes state the juvenile court ordered the maximum confinement to be 5 years, 10 months. No such oral pronouncement was ever made though by the juvenile court. The minor argues the juvenile court improperly: set his confinement time beyond the statutory maximum; failed to indicate whether it was aggregating the maximum confinement term; and failed to set forth probation conditions. Court affirm the wardship order but remand the matter with directions to calculate the maximum confinement time and set probation conditions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale