P. v. Edmond
Appellant appeals from his conviction of second degree murder. He claims that the court erred in failing to conduct an in camera investigation of a witnesss invocation of her Fifth Amendment rights and in failing to grant judicial immunity to that witness. He also argues that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, with CALJIC No. 3.02. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Edmond