Coronado v. Chaddock
Appellant sued respondent, the guardian of the estates of Coronados three children, for negligence and embezzlement related to Chaddocks management of trust property that belonged to the children. The trial court sustained Chaddocks demurrer to Coronados complaint without leave to amend and dismissed the action.
On appeal, Defendant contends that the court erred when it sustained the demurrer on the ground that Coronado did not have standing to sue, that the court erred when it failed to state its reasons for sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend in its order, and that the court abused its discretion when it failed to grant leave to amend. Coronado also argues that the court abused its discretion when it failed to rule on his motion for change of venue and when it failed to rule on Chaddocks motion for a protective order. Court find no error and affirm the judgment of dismissal.
Comments on Coronado v. Chaddock