legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Burress
Defendant was charged with sale of cocaine base, possession of cocaine base for sale, and three sentence enhancements based on prior convictions. At trial, the court admitted evidence of defendants prior misconduct under Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b) to prove his intent and knowledge. In a unitary trial, the jury found defendant guilty of possession of cocaine base for sale and found true the prior conviction allegations. On appeal, defendant contends the courts admission of evidence of his prior misconduct was an abuse of discretion and a violation of his due process rights and the trial court erred by instructing the jury on joint possession and aiding and abetting during the prosecutions case. Finding no prejudicial error or abuse of discretion, Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale