legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Carranza
A jury convicted Anthony Carranza, Jr. of one count of commercial burglary, in violation of Penal Code section 459. He admitted a prior prison term enhancement under section 667.5, subdivision (b). The enhancement resulted from a 1995 conviction for making terrorist threats, a violation of section 422. The prior conviction was also admitted to be a strike under sections 667, subdivisions (c) and (e)(1) and 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1). Defendant was therefore sentenced to a doubled midterm for a total of four years in state prison.
On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court erred in jury selection; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the burglary conviction; (3) the court erred in denying his Romero motion; and (4) the court erred in denying his motion to reduce the crime to a misdemeanor.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale