legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S. Q.
It was alleged in a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) that appellant S. Q., a minor, committed three felonies, viz., carjacking (Pen. Code, 215, subd. (a)), vehicle theft (Veh. Code, 10851) and second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211 & 212.5, subd. (c)), and two misdemeanors, viz., being under the influence of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11550, subd. (a)) and giving false information to a police officer (Pen. Code, 148.9, subd. (a)). Appellant admitted the misdemeanor allegations and, following a jurisdiction hearing, the court found the felony allegations true. Following the subsequent disposition hearing, the court adjudged appellant a ward of the court, placed her on probation and ordered her committed to the Tulare County Youth Treatment Center for a period of 45 to 180 days.
On appeal, appellant contends the court prejudicially erred in (1) refusing a defense request to recall a prosecution witness who had previously testified and been excused and (2) refusing to allow a defense investigator to testify concerning an experiment the investigator apparently conducted. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale