P. v. Hyman
Defendant appeals from an order revoking his Proposition 36 probation (Pen. Code, 1210.1 et seq.) and sentencing him to state prison for four years. He contends the judgment should be reversed because the trial court did not have sufficient evidence to conclude that his failure to report to his probation officer was not a drug-related probation violation. Additionally, he argues that the court abused its discretion in refusing to reinstate his probation based on unusual circumstances. Court reject these arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hyman