P. v. Mesa
Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions for robbery and carjacking. (Pen. Code, 211, 215.) He also contends the trial court violated his constitutional rights in sentencing him to upper terms on all offenses, and in committing other sentencing errors. Court reject appellants contentions as to the sufficiency of the evidence, but agree with appellant that the matter must be remanded for resentencing.
Comments on P. v. Mesa