legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Currier v. Chow
Plaintiff decided to go into business together, and formed two corporations for that purpose. Their efforts quickly came to naught, ending in acrimony, the bankruptcy of one of the corporations, and extensive litigation in state and federal courts. This, the fourth of the cases, was filed by Currier and the surviving corporation against Chow (and his wife) and certain attorneys who had been involved in the prior litigations. The Chows and the attorneys filed separate motions to strike Curriers complaint pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16). The trial court granted both motions, and Currier and the corporation appeal. Our independent review leads to the same conclusion as the trial courtthat Currier and the corporation have no probability of prevailing on their claims. Court thus affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale