legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Suzanne B.
Father appeals from the juvenile courts order terminating his parental rights to two year old Suzanne, seven-year-old S.B., and one-year-old M.B. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. On appeal, Father claims (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion in terminating his parental rights when he was precluded from asserting the exception to adoption found in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1) due to the unconstitutional suspension of his visitation rights, and (2) the notice requirements for complying with the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (the ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) were not satisfied, and therefore the court erred in finding that the ICWA did not apply. Court agree that the notice provisions of the ICWA were not adequately complied with and will remand the matter for that limited purpose. Court reject Fathers remaining contention.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale