In re Ruby Q.
Father and Silvia Q. appeal a judgment terminating their parental rights to their four minor children, Ruby Q., Briana Q., Roman R., and G.R. (the minors) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[2] Silvia asserts the court erred by denying her section 388 petition for modification seeking to have the minors returned to her custody, or alternatively, further reunification services. In addition, Silvia and Father challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's findings that: (1) the minors were adoptable; and (2) the beneficial parent child relationship exception ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) and the sibling relationship exception ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(E)) do not apply to preclude termination of parental rights. Court affirm the judgments.
Comments on In re Ruby Q.