Hogan v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff Sharon Hogans disability discrimination claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The issues are whether the parties arbitration agreement is unconscionable, and whether the agreement satisfies the requirements for arbitration of FEHA claims. Because the arbitration agreement is not substantively unconscionable, Court find no grounds to deny enforcement of the agreement, and reverse the order denying the motion to compel arbitration.
Comments on Hogan v. Nordstrom, Inc.