Fulton v. Matthews
Appellant appeals from an order denying her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP motion) Sara Fultons malicious prosecution action. Matthews argues the trial court applied the incorrect standard in ruling on her motion, and, alternatively, Fulton did not satisfy her burden under the correct standard. We need not address whether the court applied the incorrect standard because our review is de novo. Court conclude Fulton satisfied her burden and affirm the order. Court deny Matthewss request for attorney fees below and on appeal.
Comments on Fulton v. Matthews