legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mack
A jury convicted Clayton Mack of three counts of forcible rape (Pen. Code, 261, subd. (a)(2)), three counts of forcible oral copulation ( 288a, subd. (c)(2)), kidnapping for purposes of rape ( 209, subd. (b)(1)), residential burglary ( 459), making a criminal threat ( 422), inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant ( 273.5, subd. (a)), attempting to dissuade a witness from testifying ( 136.1, subd. (a)(2)) and disobeying a court order ( 166, subd. (a)(4)). The jury also found true a series of associated special allegations. The trial court sentenced Mack to an indeterminate prison term of 25 years to life, plus a consecutive determinate prison term of 38 years 8 months. On appeal, Mack argues the court erroneously denied his motions to change retained counsel and his motion to represent himself under Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806. He also argues that, under Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham), the court's imposition of the upper term for one component of his determinate sentence (count 9) was error.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale