Cueva v. Sulzer Orthopedics
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit granted on her product liability lawsuit. Plaintiff contends the trial court completely gutted her case when it granted motions in limine excluding certain evidence and argument concerning the recall of a hip replacement shell similar to the one she received. Plaintiff also contends the trial court erred in quashing the subpoenas of two witnesses and refusing to grant a trial continuance when it became clear she needed additional deposition discovery before proceeding to trial.
Court conclude none of the trial court's rulings unfairly prejudiced appellant, and that the court properly granted nonsuit. Accordingly, court affirm.
Comments on Cueva v. Sulzer Orthopedics