In re Katelynn E.
Appellant (father) is the father of the now five-year-old child, Katelynn E. Father challenges the juvenile courts denial of his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition for modification and the subsequent termination of his parental rights to Katelynn. Father argues that the courts orders are tainted by extrinsic fraud perpetrated by Katelynns mother (mother) when she failed to identify father as the childs father until one year into the dependency. This fraud, father argues, prevented father from participating in the proceedings, and in Katelynns life, until it was too late for him to obtain custody of the child.
Comments on In re Katelynn E.