P. v. Jimenez
Defendants appeal their convictions of robbery (Pen. Code, 211). True findings were made that each had suffered a prior prison enhancement ( 667, subd. (a)(1)) and each was sentenced to a total term of 11 years.
On appeal, they contend there was insufficient evidence to support the robbery
convictions, the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct during cross examination and closing argument, the court's response to the jury's question was inadequate, and their motions for a new trial should have been granted. Court affirm the judgments.
Comments on P. v. Jimenez