legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cox
Defendant was convicted by plea in two cases (Case No. KA061583 and Case No. KA074017) and was sentenced to three years state prison. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred in imposing duplicative restitution fines in Case No. KA061583. (Pen. Code, 1202.4, subd. (b).) Appellant also claims that the $20 court security fee ( 1465.8. subd. (a)(1)) and $200 parole revocation fine ( 1202.45) imposed in Case No. KA061583 violate ex post facto principles.
Court strike the $200 parole revocation fine in Case No. KA061583 and add a second $20 court security court fee. As modified, the judgments are affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale