P. v. Jackson
Appellant was convicted, following a jury trial, of possession for sale of methamphetamine and maintaining a place for selling or using methamphetamine. On appeal, he contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to support either of his convictions; and (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that mere access to an object is not sufficient to support a finding of unlawful possession. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Jackson