legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Maxwell S.
In this juvenile dependency appeal, father challenges an order summarily denying his petition, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, to modify a prior court order establishing a legal guardianship over his children, Jazmine (born September 1995), Jennifer (born February 1997), and Maxwell (born September 1998). He also argues reversal of the guardianship order is required for noncompliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Upon review, we find no abuse by the juvenile court in denying fathers petition without affording him a hearing. As for fathers ICWA claim, we agree that the San Bernardino Department of Childrens Services (DCS) failed to comply with the ICWAs notice requirements. However, because the time to appeal has passed and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review the guardianship order, Court are not in a position to provide any effectual relief, although father may choose to assert his position in the juvenile court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale