P. v. Cuevas
Defendant appeals from his conviction of transportation of methamphetamine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11379, subdivision (a). Defendant contends the trial court erred in (1) excluding evidence that the interpreter for defendants interrogation was a jail inmate who was not certified as an interpreter; (2) failing to instruct the jury on accomplice statements; and (3) failing to instruct the jury that the prosecution was required to prove the corpus delicti without defendants or his codefendants admissions. Defendant also contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Court find no prejudicial errors, and Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Cuevas