Dillingham & Murphy v. Geiche
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff law firm Dillingham & Murphy, LLP (D&M), on its complaint for unpaid legal fees. Geiche, who appeared in propria persona in the trial court but is represented by counsel on appeal, contends that the trial court erred in granting D&Ms motion for summary judgment. Many of the arguments asserted by Geiche in the trial court were barely comprehensible. Some are plainly wrong. Many of the arguments asserted on appeal were not raised below. Nonetheless, a fair review of Geiches papers submitted in opposition to the motion for summary judgment reveals several triable issues of material fact that preclude summary adjudication. Accordingly, Court reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Comments on Dillingham & Murphy v. Geiche